← Results Pair Results

Thursday Afternoon - Section A (31-Dec-20)

Thursday, 31 December 2020  ·  Board Summary

Board 1

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3 S -1 -50 4.0 (33%) 8.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 1NT N -1 -50 4.0 (33%) 8.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 3NT N -1 -50 4.0 (33%) 8.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3 S -1 -50 4.0 (33%) 8.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT N -1 -50 4.0 (33%) 8.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT N = +400 11.0 (92%) 1.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT N = +400 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 2

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 4 N = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 4 N = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 N = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 4 S = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 N = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 4 N = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 4 N +1 +650 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 3

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 4 W +2 -680 1.0 (8%) 11.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 4 W +2 -680 1.0 (8%) 11.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 4 W +1 -650 8.0 (67%) 4.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 W +1 -650 8.0 (67%) 4.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 4 W +1 -650 8.0 (67%) 4.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 W +1 -650 8.0 (67%) 4.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 4 W +1 -650 8.0 (67%) 4.0

Board 4

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3NT N +1 +630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3NT N +1 +630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT N +1 +630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT N +1 +630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT N +1 +630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT N +2 +660 10.0 (83%) 2.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 6NT N = +1440 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 5

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 2 E +2 -170 0.0 (0%) 12.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2 E = -110 2.0 (17%) 10.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3 N -1 -100 4.0 (33%) 8.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 E -1 +50 7.0 (58%) 5.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2 E -1 +50 7.0 (58%) 5.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2NT E -2 +100 10.0 (83%) 2.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 4NT E -4 +200 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 6

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT W +1 -630 2.0 (17%) 10.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT E +1 -630 2.0 (17%) 10.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT W +1 -630 2.0 (17%) 10.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3NT E = -600 6.0 (50%) 6.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 2NT W = -120 8.0 (67%) 4.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2 W +1 -110 10.0 (83%) 2.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3NT E -1 +100 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 7

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2 E = -110 0.0 (0%) 12.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3 E -1 +100 3.0 (25%) 9.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 E -1 +100 3.0 (25%) 9.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 3 S +1 +170 6.0 (50%) 6.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3 E -2 +200 8.0 (67%) 4.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 S = +620 11.0 (92%) 1.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 4 S = +620 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 8

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2 E -2 +100 0.0 (0%) 12.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3NT S = +400 2.0 (17%) 10.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT S +1 +430 5.0 (42%) 7.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT S +1 +430 5.0 (42%) 7.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3NT S +2 +460 10.0 (83%) 2.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 3NT S +2 +460 10.0 (83%) 2.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3NT S +2 +460 10.0 (83%) 2.0

Board 9

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT E = -600 2.0 (17%) 10.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT W = -600 2.0 (17%) 10.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3NT E = -600 2.0 (17%) 10.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2NT W +1 -150 6.0 (50%) 6.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 2NT W = -120 8.0 (67%) 4.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3NT E -1 +100 11.0 (92%) 1.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 5 E -1 +100 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 10

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 2 W +3 -150 0.0 (0%) 12.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 2 W +2 -130 3.0 (25%) 9.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2 W +2 -130 3.0 (25%) 9.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2NT E = -120 6.0 (50%) 6.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT W -1 +100 8.0 (67%) 4.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT E -2 +200 10.0 (83%) 2.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 5 W -3 +300 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 11

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 5 W +1 -420 0.0 (0%) 12.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 5 E = -400 3.0 (25%) 9.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 5 E = -400 3.0 (25%) 9.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 E +1 -150 6.0 (50%) 6.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3 S -1 -50 8.0 (67%) 4.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 5 W -1 +50 11.0 (92%) 1.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT W -1 +50 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 12

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 5 S -2 -200 0.0 (0%) 12.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2 E -2 +100 3.0 (25%) 9.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 2 W -2 +100 3.0 (25%) 9.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 2 S = +110 7.0 (58%) 5.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2 S = +110 7.0 (58%) 5.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3 S +1 +130 10.0 (83%) 2.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 2X E -3 +500 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 13

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 1NT W +1 -120 0.0 (0%) 12.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 1NT W = -90 6.0 (50%) 6.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 1NT W = -90 6.0 (50%) 6.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 1NT E = -90 6.0 (50%) 6.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 1NT E = -90 6.0 (50%) 6.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 1NT W = -90 6.0 (50%) 6.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 1NT E -1 +100 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 14

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT W +2 -460 2.0 (17%) 10.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT W +2 -460 2.0 (17%) 10.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3NT W +2 -460 2.0 (17%) 10.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT W +1 -430 6.0 (50%) 6.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3NT W = -400 8.0 (67%) 4.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3 W +3 -170 10.0 (83%) 2.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 3 W +2 -150 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 15

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 E = -420 1.0 (8%) 11.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 E = -420 1.0 (8%) 11.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 4 S -2 -200 4.0 (33%) 8.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 4 E -1 +50 6.0 (50%) 6.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 5X E -1 +100 9.0 (75%) 3.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 5X E -1 +100 9.0 (75%) 3.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 5X E -3 +500 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 16

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3 S -2 -100 1.0 (8%) 11.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3 S -2 -100 1.0 (8%) 11.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2 S -1 -50 5.0 (42%) 7.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2 S -1 -50 5.0 (42%) 7.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3 E -1 +100 8.0 (67%) 4.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 S = +140 11.0 (92%) 1.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3 S = +140 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 17

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 4 N -1 -50 1.0 (8%) 11.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3 N -1 -50 1.0 (8%) 11.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3 W -1 +50 5.0 (42%) 7.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2 W -1 +50 5.0 (42%) 7.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3 N = +140 8.0 (67%) 4.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3 N +1 +170 11.0 (92%) 1.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 N +1 +170 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 18

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 1NT E -2 +100 0.0 (0%) 12.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 2 N = +110 2.0 (17%) 10.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 1NT S +2 +150 8.0 (67%) 4.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 2 W -3 +150 8.0 (67%) 4.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2 W -3 +150 8.0 (67%) 4.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 1NT S +2 +150 8.0 (67%) 4.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 1NT S +2 +150 8.0 (67%) 4.0

Board 19

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT W +1 -630 0.0 (0%) 12.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT E = -600 2.0 (17%) 10.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 2 W +2 -170 4.0 (33%) 8.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 2NT W +1 -150 7.0 (58%) 5.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2NT W +1 -150 7.0 (58%) 5.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2 E +1 -140 10.0 (83%) 2.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT W -1 +100 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 20

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2 E -1 +100 4.0 (33%) 8.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3 E -1 +100 4.0 (33%) 8.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2 E -1 +100 4.0 (33%) 8.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 E -1 +100 4.0 (33%) 8.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3 E -1 +100 4.0 (33%) 8.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3 E -2 +200 11.0 (92%) 1.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 4 E -2 +200 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 21

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 5 S -1 -100 1.0 (8%) 11.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 5 S -1 -100 1.0 (8%) 11.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 4 S = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 4 S = +620 5.0 (42%) 7.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 S +1 +650 10.0 (83%) 2.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 4 S +1 +650 10.0 (83%) 2.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 5 S = +650 10.0 (83%) 2.0

Board 22

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 5 W = -650 3.0 (25%) 9.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 4 E +1 -650 3.0 (25%) 9.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 4 W +1 -650 3.0 (25%) 9.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 4 E +1 -650 3.0 (25%) 9.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 4 W = -620 8.0 (67%) 4.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 5 S -2 -100 10.0 (83%) 2.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 5 W -1 +100 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 23

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 1 W +3 -170 0.0 (0%) 12.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 W = -140 3.0 (25%) 9.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3 W = -140 3.0 (25%) 9.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine = 0 6.0 (50%) 6.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 1NT S = +90 8.0 (67%) 4.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 4 W -1 +100 10.0 (83%) 2.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 3 N +1 +170 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 24

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 6NT N -1 -50 0.0 (0%) 12.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 4 S = +420 4.0 (33%) 8.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 4 S = +420 4.0 (33%) 8.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 S = +420 4.0 (33%) 8.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 4 S +1 +450 9.0 (75%) 3.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 5 S = +450 9.0 (75%) 3.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 6 S = +980 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 25

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT N = +400 0.0 (0%) 12.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 4 N = +420 5.0 (42%) 7.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 4 N = +420 5.0 (42%) 7.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 N = +420 5.0 (42%) 7.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 4 N = +420 5.0 (42%) 7.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT S +1 +430 10.0 (83%) 2.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 4 N +1 +450 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 26

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2X S -4 -1100 0.0 (0%) 12.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT W +1 -630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3NT E +1 -630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT E +1 -630 4.0 (33%) 8.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3NT E = -600 8.0 (67%) 4.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3 E = -110 11.0 (92%) 1.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 E = -110 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 27

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2 N -2 -100 2.0 (17%) 10.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 S -2 -100 2.0 (17%) 10.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3 N -2 -100 2.0 (17%) 10.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3 S = +140 8.0 (67%) 4.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 S = +140 8.0 (67%) 4.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 2 S +1 +140 8.0 (67%) 4.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3 W -3 +150 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 28

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 3 S +1 +130 0.0 (0%) 12.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3NT N +1 +630 3.0 (25%) 9.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 3NT N +1 +630 3.0 (25%) 9.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 3NT N +2 +660 7.0 (58%) 5.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT N +2 +660 7.0 (58%) 5.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 1. Bourke Lex / Dailey Lorraine 3NT N +3 +690 11.0 (92%) 1.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT N +3 +690 11.0 (92%) 1.0

Board 29

Dealer: N  ·  Vul: Both View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 4 E +2 -680 0.0 (0%) 12.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 4 W +1 -650 5.0 (42%) 7.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 W +1 -650 5.0 (42%) 7.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 4 E +1 -650 5.0 (42%) 7.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 W +1 -650 5.0 (42%) 7.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 4 E = -620 10.0 (83%) 2.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 6 E -1 +100 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 30

Dealer: E  ·  Vul: None View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 2 W = -110 1.0 (8%) 11.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 2 W = -110 1.0 (8%) 11.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2 W -1 +50 4.0 (33%) 8.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3 W -2 +100 6.0 (50%) 6.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 3NT E -3 +150 10.0 (83%) 2.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3NT E -3 +150 10.0 (83%) 2.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 4 W -3 +150 10.0 (83%) 2.0

Board 31

Dealer: S  ·  Vul: NS View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 2 W = -110 1.0 (8%) 11.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 2 E = -110 1.0 (8%) 11.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 3 S -1 -100 4.0 (33%) 8.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 1 W +1 -90 6.0 (50%) 6.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 2 W -1 +50 8.0 (67%) 4.0
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 2 N +1 +140 10.0 (83%) 2.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 2 W -3 +150 12.0 (100%) 0.0

Board 32

Dealer: W  ·  Vul: EW View Traveller →
N-S Pair E-W Pair Contract Result Score NS MPs EW MPs
2. Woods Philomena / Turner Jenny 4. Laws Vilma / Kruz George 4 N -3 -150 0.0 (0%) 12.0
6. Tanner Kate / Small Bob 5. KELLY ADRIENNE / BROOKES STEPHEN 3 N -1 -50 2.0 (17%) 10.0
5. Busch Peter / Brookes Verna 3. Templeton Elizabeth / McAuliffe Gaye 1NT E -1 +100 5.0 (42%) 7.0
7. Mackinlay Ruth / Bucens Marion 7. Norris Trish / Bell Jilliana 1NT E -1 +100 5.0 (42%) 7.0
1. Killiner Helen / Slade Judith 2. McLeod Anne / Jeffries Iris 3 S = +140 9.0 (75%) 3.0
3. Tannahill Dana / Butler Cherie 6. Schwegler Pepe / Dwan Carmel 3 S = +140 9.0 (75%) 3.0
4. Phillips Michael / Drake Jo 8. Stacey John / Stacey Beverley 1NT E -2 +200 12.0 (100%) 0.0